PBF severe fuel damage test 1-3 test results report
Read Online
Share

PBF severe fuel damage test 1-3 test results report

  • 762 Want to read
  • ·
  • 90 Currently reading

Published by Division of Systems Research, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. in Washington, DC .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Nuclear fuel claddings -- Testing.,
  • Nuclear fuel rods -- Testing.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Statementprepared by Z.R. Martinson ... [et al.]
ContributionsMartinson, Zoel R., Idaho National Engineering Laboratory., EG & G Idaho., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. Division of Systems Research.
The Physical Object
Pagination1 v. (various pagings) :
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17836783M

Download PBF severe fuel damage test 1-3 test results report

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Get this from a library! PBF severe fuel damage test test results report. vol. 1. [Zoel R Martinson; D A Petti; Beverly A Cook; Chris M Allison; EG & G Idaho.; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. Division of Accident Evaluation.]. @article{osti_, title = {Results from the power burst facility severe fuel damage test ; A simulated severe fuel damage accident with irradiated fuel rods and control rods}, author = {Petti, D A and Martinson, Z R and Hobbins, R R and Osetek, D J}, abstractNote = {Highly irradiated fuel rods and control rods are used in the Power Burst Facility Severe Fuel Damage (SFD) Test to. NUREG-CR "PBF Severe Fuel Damage Test Test Results Report" NUREG/CR-1 OA Preliminary Assessment of Alternative Containments for LMFBR's" These NUREGs are available for pickup in E A comprehensive evaluation of the Severe Fuel Damage (SFD) Test performed in the Power Burst Facility (PBF) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory is presented. Test SFD was the third test in an internationally sponsored light water reactor severe accident research program, initiated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

PBF (Power Burst Facility) severe fuel damage test Volume 1, Test results report Technical Report Martinson, Z.R. ; Petti, D.A. ; Cook, B.A. A comprehensive evaluation of the Severe Fuel Damage (SFD) Test performed in the Power Burst Facility (PBF) at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory is presented. This paper presents a discussion of the expected benefits of the PBF severe fuel damage tests to the nuclear industry, a description of the first five planned experiments, the results of pretest analysis performed to predict the fuel bundle heatup for the first two experiments, and a discussion of Phase II severe fuel damage experiments. Nuclear Regulatory sponsored severe-fuel damage (SFD) experiments are presented and compared for common findings. The experiments evaluated include the partial-length (= m) rod -bundle tests performed in the Power Burst Facility (PBF), the full-length high . Immediately after the accident at Fukushima Daiichi, Innovative Systems Software and other members of the international SCDAP Development and Training Program started an assessment of the possible core/vessel damage states of the Fukushima Daiichi Units 1–3. The assessment included a brief review of relevant severe accident experiments and a series of detailed calculations using RELAP/SCDAPSIM.

PBF is one of the leading independent petroleum refiners and suppliers of unbranded transportation fuels, aviation jet fuel, heating oil, lubricant base oils, petrochemical feedstocks, sulphur, and asphalt. Products are sold throughout the Northeast and Midwest United States, as well as in other regions of the United States and Canada.   The overall results across the test fleet showed a reduction in CO 2 of % for the FTP and % for the HFET tests for Tier 3 compared to Tier 2 test fuel. For fuel economy the overall reduction was % for the FTP and % for the HFET tests for Tier 3 compared to Tier 2 test fuel. not required, but the penalties for failure to report when required can be severe. EXHIBIT 2−1 Definition of Hazardous Material, Waste, Substance, and Chemical Hazardous Material as regulated by dot in 49 CFr Capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported. hazardous materials are listed in. The MAAP v.4 software has been used to model two severe accident scenarios in nuclear power reactors with three different materials as fuel cladding. The TMI-2 severe accident was modeled with Zircaloy-2 and SiC as clad material and a SBO accident in a Zion-like, 4-loop, Westinghouse PWR was modeled with Zircaloy-2, SiC, and stainless steel.